Consanguinity

1 Compiled by GenePool MONTH YEAR

The Least You Need to Know
Coffee Break Summary
Pitfalls to avoid
Find Out More
Clinical Scenarios

 

The Least You Need to Know

  • Consanguinity is common, especially in people originating from North Africa, the Middle East and large parts of Asia.
  • Most consanguineous marriages are legal in the UK; the exceptions are relationships between second degree relatives (e.g. uncle-niece, half sibs), and incest, i.e. relationships between first degree relatives.
  • The population risk of having a child with a severe or lethal medical condition is around 2%; for a first cousin couple this increases to around 5% - this risk is frequently over-estimated.
  • The risks associated with consanguinity are greater if there is a family history of an autosomal recessive condition.
  • A non-judgemental attitude to consanguineous couples is essential to foster good working relationships between the medical profession and communities where consanguineous marriage is prevalent.

Coffee Break Summary

Definition:   Consanguinity means descent from a common ancestor; a consanguineous couple is usually defined as being related as second cousins or closer. The word derives from ‘con’+ ‘sanguine’ – from the Latin, meaning ‘of the same blood’.

History

Consanguineous marriage has been a part of most societies as far back as the Old Testament of the Bible – Leviticus 18 provides instructions about which relatives cannot marry. Famous first cousin couples include Charles Darwin and Emma Wedgwood, and Albert Einstein and Elsa Einstein. However, in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century, as the study of genetics began in earnest, the question of the increased risk of medical problems in the offspring of such unions was raised, and more recently the prevailing attitude particularly in the USA has been disapproval of marriage to close relatives.

In English law, the Marriage Act 1949 sets out a schedule of prohibited marriages. Interestingly cousin marriages are not prohibited in English Law.

Social Aspects

Consanguineous marriage today is most prevalent in communities originating from North Africa, the Middle East, and large parts of Asia. In the British Pakistani community it is estimated that 50-60% of marriages are consanguineous, and there is evidence that this proportion is rising. Geographical or social isolation of migrant groups may play a part in this. In addition, such populations may have a degree of inbreeding due to many generations of marriage within the community, even in couples who are not formally consanguineous.

First-cousin marriages are the most common, but closer relationships such as double first cousins also occur.

Reported benefits of consanguineous marriage include:

  • Keeping property and money within the family
  • Staying within a well-understood family unit
  • Improving the position of women by decreasing the chances of maltreatment from a husband bound by family ties

The main perceived disadvantage is the (frequently exaggerated) worry about offspring risks, but anxiety about social stigma and difficulty living an autonomous married life separate from the wider family have also been reported. It is important for consanguineous couples to encounter open and non-judgemental attitudes to their relationship from the medical profession, to enable steps to be taken at individual and population levels to decrease morbidity and mortality while avoiding disruption of traditions and social norms.

Genetic Aspects

The population risk for any couple of having a child with a serious or lethal medical condition is around 2% (1 in 50). The excess risk for a couple who are related as first cousins, in the absence of a known genetic disease in the family, is in the order of 3% (1 in 30). This fact often comes as a relief to couples who expect a significantly higher figure.

The excess risk is as a result of autosomal recessive conditions arising due to homozygosity by descent – that is, the risk of a recessive mutation present in an ancestor being passed down 2 branches of the family, and coming together in the consanguineous marriage. It is thought that we all carry at least one mutated allele which would cause an autosomal recessive condition if present in two copies (homozygousity). If this mutant allele is passed down to both members of a consanguineous couple from a shared ancestor they will both be carriers for this condition, and will therefore have a 1 in 4 chance of having an affected child.

The chance of both parents being carriers for a recessive condition is determined by how closely they are related, which means that the offspring risks can be minimised while retaining the social benefits of consanguinity if marriages occur between more distant relatives (e.g. second rather than first cousins).

Pre-marital Counselling

Some consanguineous couples or their families ask for pre-marital advice to make an informed decision about their offspring risks. Such requests may be referred directly to the Regional Genetics Service, where non-directive counselling will be offered to explain the mechanisms of autosomal recessive inheritance and the specific risks for that couple. A full three-generation pedigree will also be taken in search of possible autosomal recessive conditions, and carrier testing can be arranged for conditions known to be common in the relevant ethnic group.

If there is a family history of a possible autosomal recessive condition, this may increase the offspring risks considerably over the background risks of consanguinity. If there is a known mutation in the family, the couple can be tested for their carrier status and prenatal diagnosis offered if required. If the diagnosis or mutation is not known, investigation of an affected relative may be possible. Otherwise, an estimate of the risks involved and detailed fetal scans (if appropriate) are the only option, and this leaves many couples feeling disturbed at the remaining uncertainty.

If an affected child dies, or an affected pregnancy is terminated, a post mortem examination will be suggested, as this represents the best chance to make the diagnosis and identify the causative mutation. While of course this is a stressful topic to raise with grieving parents, and there may be religious objections. However, it is important that all couples and their advisors understand that a post mortem is being offered in the hope that it may enable their doctors to tell whether their next child might be affected by the same condition.

It can be extremely frustrating for a couple if, in a future pregnancy, the lack of information about their first child makes it impossible to provide accurate advice and testing.

Clinical Presentations

When an abnormality or illness presents in the child of a consanguineous couple, investigations and referrals should proceed as clinically indicated for the presenting symptoms, but with an emphasis on autosomal recessive conditions in the differential diagnosis. However, it is important to remember that most childhood illness in consanguineous families is unrelated to the consanguinity, and autosomal recessive conditions (particularly the more common ones) may arise by chance in consanguineous couples, with the child having two different mutations. If this can be proved, it can help parents to know that their consanguinity is not responsible for the condition.

It is important to have a high index of suspicion for inborn errors of metabolism in children of consanguineous parents, as most of these conditions are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner, and while individually rare, collectively they represent a significant burden of disease, including some conditions which are treatable if caught at an early stage. A number of recessive genes cause prelingual deafness, and it is important for babies of consanguineous parents to receive their routine hearing tests.

Aside from autosomal recessive conditions which cause learning difficulties, consanguinity does not have any effect on intelligence, and there is no evidence that consanguinity affects fertility or adult health. Consanguineous couples with a child with an undiagnosed medical condition have a higher chance than unrelated couples of future children being affected, due to the possibility of an unrecognised autosomal recessive condition.

Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Don’t wait to refer a consanguineous couple until a pregnancy is underway, especially if they have a family history of a possible autosomal recessive condition.
  • Don’t imply that a child’s condition is their parents’ fault – even if a couple are consanguineous and the child has two identical copies of a mutant gene, no one chooses to pass on an illness and no one is ‘to blame’.
  • Ensure that couples referred for pre-marital counselling are aware that it is not possible to provide blood tests looking for general ‘genetic compatibility’, apart from a few basic carrier tests for a limited range of specific conditions.

Find out More

Getting help

Find out more – web resources

The Australian Centre for Genetics Education has a helpful fact sheet on cansanguinity at: http://www.genetics.com.au/pdf/factsheets/fs16.pdf

Taking and Drawing a Family History (NGEDC) http://www.geneticseducation.nhs.uk/family_history/Family_History_Series.pdf

Guidelines for pedigree drawing can be found at: http://www.clingensoc.org/Docs/Standards/CGSPedigree.pdf

An American website run by and for couples who are cousins: www.cousincouples.com

Find out more – further reading

Harper PS (2004). Practical Genetic Counselling, 6th Edition. London, Arnold, pp. 131-140.

A respected reference on genetic counselling – covers all basic topics clearly and thoroughly

Bennett RL, Motulsky AG, Bittles A, Hudgins L, Uhrich S, Lochner Doyle D, Silvey K, Ronald Scott C, Cheng E, McGillivray B, Steiner RD and Olson D (2002). Genetic counselling and screening of consanguineous couples and their offspring: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Counsel 11 (2) pp. 97-119.

Available at http://guidelines.gov, American recommendations which are not in routine practice in the UK, but provides useful pointers

Clinical Scenarios

Mrs Jackson

The Patient's Story
Your Responses

Mr S and Miss T come to your clinic and tell you that they are planning to get married, but they are first cousins. Their parents have told them that they have a high chance of having children with learning difficulties, and they are therefore opposed to the marriage.

You reassure them that the risks may be less than they think, but explain that you can advise them better if you get more information about the family. You construct a three-generation pedigree.

They tell you that Miss T has a first cousin with severe learning difficulties and a number of physical problems which have required many operations over the years.

You ask if the parents of this child are related, and they answer that they are first cousins. You ask whether a diagnosis has been made in this child, and they tell you that they do not know – the family do not talk about him much. You then ask where this child has been treated, and they reply that he spends a lot of time in Great Ormond Street.

You explain that in general the risk of first cousins having a child with medical problems is around 5%, or 1 in 20, compared to around 2% for unrelated couples, but that if their cousin has a genetic condition the risks could be higher. You explain that you will refer them for genetic counselling at the local Regional Genetics Service, and ask them to get as much information as possible about her ill cousin to take to their appointment, in order to predict whether they would be at risk of having a child with the same condition.

They tell you that they thought the chances of their having a child with problems was much higher, so they are relieved, and they will approach her aunt and uncle to find out more about her cousin. You write a referral letter to the local Genetics Service including some background on the family situation (that the parents are opposed to the marriage), and as much information as you can about the ill cousin – his name, address, DOB, GP details, name of consultant etc. if known.

Scenario 2

The Patient's Story
Your Responses

Mrs P comes to see you with her first child, a 14 month-old baby. She is worried because he has been vomiting for several days, and she seems very anxious

You take some further history and ask whether he has vomited before.
She tells you that he has these episodes about once a month, when he vomits for 24 hours and smells odd and then gradually goes back to normal. This time it has lasted longer than usual, so she has brought him to see you because she is worried he is dehydrated. You ask whether anything seems to bring on these attacks, and she replies that she has to feed him very regularly or it makes him vomit.

You examine the child, and he does not appear dehydrated. While examining him you ask Mrs P whether she and her husband are related.

Mrs P appears upset by this question and replies that she has only come so you can make him stop vomiting, and it is irrelevant whether she and her husband are related. She says her husband told her that if she brought the child to the doctor it would all be blamed on their relationship. You reply that some medical problems are more common in children of cousin parents, and therefore it is important to know this, although in most cases it is indeed irrelevant.
She tells you that they are second cousins, but there is no family history of any problems, and two of her sisters are married to first cousins and they have normal children so it is nothing to do with her child’s illness. You apologise for any upset caused by the question, but explain why you need to have the information to provide the best treatment. You then telephone the local paediatric registrar, who agrees that there is a chance that the child might have an inborn error of metabolism, and the child is admitted to hospital for further investigations.

  • Publication Date: 04 Jul 2006
  • Publication Type: Briefing
  • Publisher: GenePool
  • Creator: GenePool
  • Next Review Date: 01 Dec 2012